Ron Wyatt went to Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia with his two sons in 1984. The only differences between the views are their proposed routes from Egypt to the Red Sea and the placing of the Red Sea crossing. Both sets of proponents of this view used the same archaeological evidence to prove their points. Ron Wyatt is the key player in this discovery. Their stated concern to me was that my mentioning of him would "dignify him" and that they consider him a "con man." They feared that mentioning them in the same paragraph as Wyatt would result in "guilt by association"! I pointed out to them that, when publishing research results, one must begin with a discussion of the history of research and include a review of the literature on the subject. While I was writing the first article, some proponents of Jebel al-Lawz not with Ron Wyatt requested that I not mention him. These researchers “speak the truth in love” but state that Ron Wyatt has not been truthful in his claims. This book is a careful, meticulous, in-depth study of Ron Wyatt’s claims. It is entitled Holy Relics or Revelation, written by two SDA researchers, Russell and Colin Standish (Hartland Publications). However, I would like to call your attention to a recent book examining the claims of Ron Wyatt.
#THOSE WHO REMAIN TUNRIN LOCATION FULL#
Whatever one may think of Ron Wyatt’s "discoveries," he should be given full credit for this discovery. Ron Wyatt first proposed the idea that Mt. Sinai is at Jebel al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia. I believe that this paper, along with the Bible and Spade article, will conclusively demonstrate that there is no credible historical, geographical, archaeological, or biblical evidence to support the thesis that Mt. Was it in the Gulf of Akaba/Eilat or the Gulf of Suez? The final section of this paper deals with the location of the Red Sea crossing.
The questions dealt with include the following: This paper discusses the third aspect, the archaeological evidence, in more detail. This paper discusses the first two aspects briefly because they have already been dealt with in the Fall 2000 issue of Bible and Spade (Franz 2000: 101 –13). Third, the paper examines the archaeological evidence. Second, the paper disputes the false assumptions by the proponents of Jebel al-Lawz. First, the paper questions the credibility of that position's claims. This paper examines three aspects of the identification of Mt. These sources also told about underwater searches for Pharaoh’s chariots and weapons from the Egyptian army. The last ten years have witnessed a proliferation of books, videos, websites, and television programs that have proposed a new site for Mt. It has been slightly edited for Web presentation. This paper was originally presented at the ETS/NEAS meeting on Thursday, November 15, 2001.
0 kommentar(er)
